Back to Top

Analele Universității din Oradea Fascicula Limba și Literatura Română (ALLRO)

An OPEN ACCESS SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL

Analele Universităţii din Oradea Seria Filologie, Fascicula Limba şi Literatura română © 2025 by Florin Cioban is licensed under CC BY-ND 4.0     Picture2.png

 

ANNALS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ORADEA ROMANIAN LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE FASCICULE (ALLRO) is an academic, peer-reviewed journal, aiming to bridge the world of academic literary criticism and theories with evaluations on everyday literary phenomenon. The general outlook of our journal is that the field of theory should be connected to the most recent realities of contemporary research regarding cultural, linguistic and literary phenomena.

THE TOPICS COVERED BY OUR JOURNAL: ◊ The dynamics and trends of Romanian literature. ◊ The dialogue of Romanian literature with other cultures and literatures. ◊ Identity, otherness, anthropology and literature, cultural studies. ◊ Identity and literary constructs. ◊ Time and literary theory. ◊ Myths and (Post)modern authors. ◊ Language phenomena, Romance languages and literatures. ◊ Comparative literature. ◊ European Romance languages and literatures and their dialogues with other continents.

Candidates who want to submit directly should use the journal's e-mail (institutional)address:

Publication languages are: English, Romanian, French and Italian. 

ALLRO advocates the double-blind peer-review system. The authors must assume their ideas and are responsible for the originality of the articles. 

Contact: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.  

 

 142301 ceeol               

 

Contact

Redactor șef: Ioana Cistelecan

Facultatea de Litere

Campus central, Pavilion C/parter

Str. Universității nr. 1
480178 Oradea, Bihor
Romania

 

 

Notes to contributors

We accept only electronic manuscript submissions. Send your submissions to: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Our journal does not charge fees for the review and the publishing of articles.
 
DUTIES OF AUTHORS
Originality and Plagiarism
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.
Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication
An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.
Acknowledgement of Sources
Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

STYLE
Authors are responsible for ensuring that their manuscripts conform to the journal style. The Editors will not undertake retyping of manuscripts before publication.
Paper size: A4
    Margins (top, bottom, left, right): 2 cm.
    Font: Georgia.
    Font size: 14 (title of the paper), 12 (body text).
    Font style: bold (title of paper), regular (body text), italic (words from other languages, and words in the body text intended to be especially emphasized)
    Alignment of body text: justified.
    Line spacing: single.
    Indent the first line of each paragraph 2 cm from left. Do not indent the first line of the paragraph that immediately follows a title or subtitle.
    Do not add page numbers, headers or footers.
    Do not exceed 12 pages.
    Add your surname and name (Georgia, 12, Regular) right aligned two lines extra space below the title of your paper. University/ affiliation comes as first footnote for surname and name.
    Abstract of the paper, 2 lines extra space below surname and name, indented 2 cm from left. The title Abstract is bolded; the text of the abstract is written in italics, Georgia, 11.
    Key words (3 to 5) one line extra space below the abstract. Key words are written in bold, the other 3 to 5 words – in italics, Georgia, 11.
    Article: 3 lines extra space below key words.
    Footnotes. If your paper contains notes, place them at the bottom of the page (footnotes). They should be as few and as short as possible, and should not contain bibliographical references. Place such references directly in the text, in parentheses.
    References used in the paper should be given in an alphabetical list (Georgia, 11) at the end of the paper (2 lines extra space below the article) under the heading.
References:
Halliday, M.A.K. 1991. 'Corpus studies and probabilistic grammar' in English Corpus Linguistics. K. Aijmer and B. Altenberg (eds.). London : Longman.
Ladenfoged, P. 1982. A Course in Phonetics. New York : Harcourt, Brace and Jovanovich.
Daniel, R. T. 1995. `The History of Western Music' in Britannica Online: Macropedia [Online]. Available at: http://www.eb. com:180/cgibin/ g:DocF=macro/ 5004/45/html [retrieved on 1995-06-14]
References in the text should use the following format:
(Cook 35-36)
"… as Cook (35-36) states…"
    Authors are solely responsible for the accuracy of their references.
    Quotations should be written between inverted commas; do not use italics; the quotations which are longer than three lines will be written at 2 cm left margin of the text – Georgia, 11 – leaving 1 line extra space after and before the text of the article.
    Titles of the subchapters should be written one line extra space below the text, using Roman numbering, bold, Georgia, 12.
    Figures. All tables, figures, illustrations, and other graphics should be presented with appropriate captions. Phrase structure trees, argumentation schemata, networks, flowcharts, and diagrams should be kept to a minimum. Figures should be freely movable in the text, and should be referred to by number (e.g. "Fig. 1"), and not by expressions such as "the figure below", or "the figure above".
 
 

Call for papers

Call for Papers

Confluențe. Texts and Contexts Reloaded

 

 Posthuman Horizons: Human / Nonhuman Relations in Literature, Media and Culture

For issue 2026

 “The boundary between human and animal is thoroughly breached.”

(Donna Haraway, A Cyborg Manifesto)

 

As technological transformation, ecological crisis, and multispecies perspectives reshape our understanding of the world, the boundaries between the human and the nonhuman are increasingly called into question. Literature, media, and cultural texts have become important sites for imagining and negotiating the complex relations between humans, animals, machines, environments, and material objects.

The editorial board of Confluențe – Annals of the University of Oradea, Modern Literature Fascicle invites submissions for a thematic issue titled Posthuman Horizons: Human / Nonhuman Relations in Literature, Media and Culture.

In recent decades, posthumanist thought has profoundly reshaped debates in the humanities by challenging the assumption that the human occupies a central and privileged position within systems of meaning, culture, and knowledge. Rather than treating the human as an autonomous and stable category, posthumanist approaches examine how subjectivity, agency, and identity emerge through dynamic relations with the nonhuman world.

Scholars working within posthumanist, new materialist, and ecological frameworks—including Donna Haraway, Rosi Braidotti, N. Katherine Hayles, Cary Wolfe, Bruno Latour, Jane Bennett, Stacy Alaimo, Timothy Morton, and Karen Barad—have drawn attention to the limitations of anthropocentric thinking and proposed new conceptual models for understanding life, agency, and relationality in a more-than-human world.

Within this intellectual context, literature, media, and cultural production offer powerful spaces for imagining alternative forms of coexistence between humans and nonhumans. Narratives of hybrid identities, technological embodiment, ecological interdependence, and multispecies relations challenge inherited hierarchies and invite us to reconsider what it means to be human in an age increasingly shaped by technological mediation and planetary crisis.

 

This issue invites contributors to reflect on questions such as:

  • How do literary and cultural narratives challenge anthropocentric assumptions and foreground entanglements between humans and nonhumans?
  • In what ways do texts imagine new forms of agency distributed across animals, machines, environments, and material objects?
  • How do representations of technological embodiment, artificial intelligence, or ecological crisis reshape our understanding of subjectivity and ethics?
  • Can literature and cultural media offer new imaginative frameworks for thinking about coexistence in a more-than-human world?

By bringing together perspectives from literary studies, media studies, cultural theory, and related disciplines, this issue seeks to explore how cultural texts reimagine the place of the human within complex ecological, technological, and material networks.

 

Contributions may focus on but are not limited to

Posthuman Theory and Philosophy

  • posthumanism and literary theory
  • new materialism and object-oriented ontology
  • posthuman subjectivity and agency
  • posthuman ethics and relational ontologies

Ecological and Multispecies Perspectives

  • human–animal relations in literature and culture
  • ecocriticism and environmental humanities
  • multispecies storytelling
  • ecological crisis and literary imagination

Technology, Media, and the Digital

  • artificial intelligence and narrative
  • cyborg identities and technological embodiment
  • digital subjectivity and virtual bodies
  • media ecologies and technological environments

Genres and Cultural Imaginaries

  • science fiction and speculative fiction
  • dystopian and post-apocalyptic imaginaries
  • hybrid bodies and posthuman identities
  • representations of biotechnology and bioengineering

Contributions may focus on literatures written in or related to the Anglophone, Francophone, or German-speaking worlds, as well as comparative and interdisciplinary approaches. The articles may be written in EnglishFrench, and German.

 

Submission Guidelines

  • Articles should be 5,000–7,000 words, including references.
  • Manuscripts must be original, unpublished, and not under consideration elsewhere.
  • Submissions undergo double-blind peer review.
  • The journal is open access and does not charge publication fees.

 

Important Dates

Deadline for article submission: 1 July

Peer review: August – October

Revised articles due: 10 November

Publication: December issue

The submission proposals and full articles should be emailed to

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

 

Suggested Bibliography:

Alaimo, Stacy. Bodily Natures: Science, Environment, and the Material Self. Indiana University Press, 2010.

Barad, Karen. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Duke University Press, 2007.

Bennett, Jane. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Duke University Press, 2010.

Braidotti, Rosi. The Posthuman. Polity Press, 2013.

Haraway, Donna. “A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century”, in Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature (New York; Routledge, 1991), pp.149-181, 1991.

Haraway, Donna. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press, 2016.

Hayles, N. Katherine. How We Became Posthuman. Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. University of Chicago Press, 1999.

Latour, Bruno. We Have Never Been Modern. Harvard University Press, 1993.

Morton, Timothy. Hyperobjects: Philosophy and Ecology after the End of the World. University of Minnesota Press, 2013.

Wolfe, Cary. What Is Posthumanism? University of Minnesota Press, 2010.

Peer review policy

Our journal advocates double blind peer-review system. The quality of the research article is the single argument taken into account when operating the selection of articles.

The editorial team of our journal first selects the submissions according to their relevance to the suggested topic/ thematic of each issue. Submissions passing the initial editorial screening enter the double-blind peer review process. As a rule, this involves the anonymous evaluation of each submission by 2 referees, selected among the Advisory Board Members, according to their field of expertise.

The review of the submissions is done:

- through elaborate comments on the text, which allow the reviewers to freely and constructively express their suggestions, criticisms, and appreciations.

- by filling the peer-review form that evaluates the following aspects:

  • the clarity of the title and its appropriateness to the content of the manuscript,
  • the way in which the abstract captures the content of the manuscript,
  • whether the introductory section outlines the relevance of the article for the given field, offers a good overview of previous studies on the same topic, and presents a clearly formulated thesis,
  • whether the paper has a solid and well-informed theoretical background, relevant for the analysis/ argumentation,
  • the originality of the paper and the significance of its contribution to the field,
  • how the concluding section summarizes the results and the consequences/implications,
  • the quality and relevance of references,
  • appropriate citation and referencing,
  • stylistic and grammatical accuracy.

The reviewer’s decision materializes in one of the three possible recommendations, namely: acceptance in the initial form, conditional acceptance (minor/ moderate/ major changes in form, style and/or content), or rejection. In the event of significant discrepancy between the recommendations of the two reviewers, a third specialist is called upon to assist in the final decision of publication or rejection.

The administration of the peer-review process is the attribution of the reviews editors. The sender of the manuscript does not know the names of the reviewers of his/her particular case, only the complete list of reviewers.

The complete list of reviewers will be included in every other issue .The general editor may supplement the initial list of reviewers, if necessary.

Page 9 of 17