ANALELE UNIVERSITĂŢII DIN ORADEA FASCICULA LIMBA ŞI
LITERATURA ROMÂNĂ

ISSN 1224-7588

Peer-review policy

The authors must assume their ideas and be able to defend them against critical evaluations. Even a text of criticism and/or a research article, even a book review is an authentic expression of scientific opinion. The sent manuscript always becomes enriched by being read, assessed and by having a dialogue with a professional reader. 

The editorial board decides which papers are sent to the peer-reviewers. The reviews editors have the mission to facilitate the circulation of manuscripts from the authors to the peer-reviewers. Each manuscript is assigned to two peer-reviewers. 

The peer-reviewers send to the reviews editors the filled-in form with their evaluation concerning the publication, their comments and suggestions for correction, their indications about the parts that need revision. The reviews editors pass on the recommandations for revisions, the corrections and suggestions to the author. The reviews editors keep all the forms filled-in by the peer-reviewers in a special file, in print form. When the authors return their manuscripts with the included corrections, the reviews editors check the overall congruency of the revisions with the indications or comments of the forms filled-in by the peer-reviewers. 

When the draft of the new issue is handed in to the editorial secretary, who is in charge to make up the table of contents and, after meetings with the editor-in-chief, decides on the sections of the new issue. The final decision of the selection or rejection of a manuscript is taken by the editor-in-chief.

See our peer-review form here:
DOWNLOAD FORM

Please, also consult our Code of Ethics.